The BS-to-EN Transition in Fire Door Standards – Why Accreditation Matters Now More Than Ever

The UK fire door industry is entering a period of significant change. Long-standing BS 476 testing methods are being phased out in favour of EN 1634-1 and EN 13501-2 — European standards that are more comprehensive, internationally recognised, and aligned with performance-based safety requirements.

While this transition is primarily a technical shift, it carries a much wider implication: the critical importance of sourcing fire doors from third-party accredited manufacturers who can demonstrate compliance, quality, and traceability.

Understanding the Standards

EN 1634-1 – The Test Method

EN 1634-1 is the fire resistance test for door assemblies. Unlike older BS tests, it requires the entire door system — including leaf, frame, intumescent seals, glazing, and hardware — to be tested as a complete unit under furnace conditions.
It measures:

  • Integrity (E): The time before flames or smoke pass through

  • Insulation (I): The time before the unexposed surface reaches a critical temperature

EN 13501-2 – The Classification Standard

Once the EN 1634-1 test is complete, EN 13501-2 provides the framework for expressing results in a clear, consistent way.
For example:

  • EI 60 = integrity and insulation for 60 minutes

  • E 120 = integrity for 120 minutes

In short:

  • EN 1634-1 tells you how to test

  • EN 13501-2 tells you how to state the result

The BS-to-EN Transition – Key Dates

  • March 2025 – First step: BS 476 references begin to be removed from Building Regulations for certain applications.

  • September 2029 – Final step: BS 476, including BS 476-22 for fire doors, will no longer be recognised. All testing and classification must be to EN 1634-1 and EN 13501-2.

This change will require new or replacement fire doors to meet EN standards exclusively, with a stronger emphasis on whole-system performance.

Why Third-Party Accreditation Is Essential

Accredited Manufacturers

Manufacturers operating under schemes such as BM TRADA Q-Mark, FIRAS, or IFC are subject to:

  • Initial type testing to EN 1634-1, with classification to EN 13501-2

  • Regular independent audits to ensure ongoing compliance

  • Production consistency checks to confirm doors match the tested specification

  • Up-to-date technical oversight, ensuring they stay ahead of regulatory changes

Uncertified Manufacturers

By contrast, suppliers without third-party certification:

  • May have no knowledge of the EN transition or upcoming deadlines

  • May be supplying products that have never been tested to any recognised standard

  • Have no audit trail, meaning there is no evidence of compliance if challenged

  • Cannot demonstrate traceability from manufacture to installation

The Compliance and Safety Risks

Using uncertified fire doors presents serious risks:

  • Non-compliant products may fail in real fire conditions, potentially within minutes

  • Building control approval may be refused due to lack of recognised certification

  • Insurance claims could be invalidated if an uncertified door is implicated in a loss

  • There may be legal consequences in the event of injury or death caused by failure

Conclusion

The move from BS 476 to EN 1634-1 and EN 13501-2 represents a fundamental shift in how the UK assesses and classifies fire door performance. This transition is not optional — it is a regulatory requirement with a clear deadline.

Choosing a third-party accredited manufacturer like Kent Flush Doors ensures your fire doors are tested, certified, and continually audited to meet the latest standards, keeping your projects compliant and your occupants safe.

In fire safety, there is no margin for uncertainty. Accreditation is not just best practice — it’s essential.

Next
Next

Why FD120 Fire Doors Are the Heavyweight Champions of Fire Protection